Americanah Essay Topics

Americanah Essay TopicsAn Americanah essay topic can be as broad or as specific as you would like it to be. Your topic does not have to be based on a true story, or even inspired by an interesting historical figure, but will rather be related to the particular theme you are choosing to write about.In many cases, you will find that the most common themes that are used for writing Americanah essay topics are all types of humanity. Sometimes the biggest literary events, in the grand scale of human history, are all of a sudden forgotten - such as the role American blacks played in the civil rights movement and the role of women in modern times. Whether this is by accident or by design, we will never know, but it is a good example of how a large number of Americans have come to deal with society in a different way.Many writers who choose to use Americanah essay topics have not taken into account the specific characteristics of American history and culture. They tend to feel that a subject should be relevant to every life or every time in the US. In the case of a true American history story, however, the theme is entirely a matter of personal preference, based on which circumstances the writer finds themselves in.Themes like 'Who is America,' or 'What makes Americans great,' or even 'How did America evolve' will be very useful in choosing an Americanah essay topic. If, for example, your own experiences as a child, youth, or adult, have shaped the theme of your writing, then Americana will make an ideal topic.Whether your ideas are based on specific events, such as the battle of Little Big Horn, or are somehow a more general concept, such as American history and tradition, you will find that Americans are remarkably good at finding their own stories in the world around them. This is, of course, the same trait that has given America such a unique personality.History, however, is more than the story of how countries came to be or have been influenced by one another. The re is also the question of what happened to these nations, and how they have evolved over time. There is something else: how do they view their own history and how they see those of other nations?No one can ever fully tell the story of American history or any other history for that matter. However, it is possible to relate some part of it to your own life experiences and see if you can figure out what led up to certain things. There is no limit to the kind of theme you can choose, but there are many Americanah essay topics that will focus on the elements of American history that you are most familiar with.

Should Marijuana Be Legalized-Canada - 2426 Words

For Many years there have been debates on the possibilities of legalizing marijuana. There are many different opinions on this touchy subject. The opinion many have on marijuana being legalized in Canada would be a lawful act. The fact that marijuana is not as harmful as alcohol and other legal drugs would make it acceptable, and how taxing marijuana would bring in more money to Canada’s government. Also legalizing marijuana would free up police and court recourses, to fight against more serious crimes, and also how marijuana is a gateway drug is a false implication. The drug marijuana in general, is not more harmful than alcohol or other legal drugs such as tobacco (If used in moderation). Many people assume†¦show more content†¦This is a huge amount of money raised threw government taxation. The legalization of marijuana would create another item that could be taxed. The government would have no problem spending all that extra money. Seeing how the war on drugs is an expensive battle, why would the not legalize marijuana and tax it? John Berick is from the liberal party and he says â€Å"it is an opportunity for us to legalize marijuana and gain money from the taxation of it to help our current economic situation†[7]. This quote proves that taxing marijuana would be a smart idea for the government; it would bring in more money to go towards helping our current economic situation. The government would be saving there time and money from trying to win a battle that can not be won on the street’s and in the end, legalizing marijuana would be free money to them. From further research, the government is spending about 7.7 billion dollars a year on capturing the users and dealers. A great deal of expenses goes into catching them, prosecuting them in court, and housing them in jail. In common sense, it would seem to make sense for the government to legalize marijuana and tax it. Legalizing marijuana would free up police and court recourses to fight more serious crimes. Many consider the war on drugs an expensive failure. Recourses for DEA, FBI, and border security are only the tip of the iceberg. You must add in the cost ofShow MoreRelatedShould Marijuana Be Legalized? Canada?1244 Words   |  5 PagesThe Grass is Greener on the Other Side Weed, ganja, pot-all names for the illegal drug marijuana. In Canada possession of cannabis otherwise known as marijuana is a criminal offence punishable by law, and can come with some serious consequences. Although Illegal the harmful effects of cannabis has on the human body are few compared to its legal counter parts such as tobacco and alcohol. In Canada marijuana has been an outlawed substance as a result of the Narcotics Drug Act Amendment Bill of 1923Read MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1524 Words   |  7 PagesMarijuana makes you calm. Marijuana reduces stress. Marijuana cures diseases such as cancer. Marijuana is not a drug. Marijuana is a plant; therefore it is not dangerous to one’s health and overall being. Many have heard it all before, the hundreds of reasons as to why marijuana is deemed as a â€Å"safe† drug and why it should be legalized, yet people have not quite heard the hundreds of reasons as to why it should stay illegal. In today’s soci ety, there is a huge controversy on the topic of marijuanaRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized? Essay1520 Words   |  7 PagesMarijuana was first criminalized in 1923 when it was added to the narcotics act. In 1971 the LeDain commission recommended the decriminalization of simple possessions of marijuana, followed by the legalization of medical marijuana in 2001. Currently, the liberal government is taking steps towards their promise, to legalize marijuana, made during the 2015 election. Currently, there are laws that regulate the use of marijuana in Canada. It is illegal to possess or sell marijuana for non-medial purposesRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1010 Words   |  5 Pagesthat marijuana is natural, calms one down, and gives a good satisfying feeling. They also say that marijuana is not as dangerous as Marijuana is a huge issue in today society. With the new liberal government in place, Trudeau takes an irrational lead in legalizing marijuana. Marijuana contains an active ingredient, THC, which is responsible for the psychological effects of marijuana. The THC binds to the receptors in the brain and influence one’s memory, concentration, mood etc. If marijuana is alreadyRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1054 Words   |  5 PagesHistorically, marijuana has been an illegal substance in Canada since 1923, mainly because of the perspective that the harmful consequences of its abuse and its addictive nature outweigh the significant benefits of making it a legal drug. Although laws have evolved as culture and society has evolved, Canada continues to struggle with the decriminalization of marijuana, despite its numerous benefits, it continues to form an archaic boundary line. This essay will discuss: 1) how laws regarding theRead MoreLegalization of Marijuana Research Paper1726 Words   |  7 PagesMarijuana is a very popular drug that many people have used. Over 98 million people over the age of 12 in the United States have smoke d marijuana. It is known under many different names such as: weed, bud, ganja, hashish, doobie, reefer, mary-jane and grass. It plays quite a substantial role in modern day pop culture and almost everyone over the age of 16 knows what it is. Despite all this, marijuana is illegal and in most states a person can be sent to jail for the possession of less than a gramRead MoreTicketing for Small Amounts of Marijuana in Canada852 Words   |  3 Pagesissue ticket to those caught with tiny amounts of marijuana. However, these legal changes should not be interpreted as either a legalization or decriminalization of marijuana. Rather they should be interpreted as additional enforcement measures that, should they need them, are available to police officers. Likewise, there is good reason to believe that this novel ‘ticketing system’ would only apply to simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana. Additionally, these tickets would function similarlyRead MoreLegalization O f Marijuana For Recreational Use1071 Words   |  5 PagesProfessor Sheila Gordon Drugs, Society Human Behavior 12 April 2017 Legalization of marijuana for recreational use in Canada The Federal Government promises to legalize marijuana in Canada. But it should be revised in accounting to those pot legalization strategies and results gained in other parts of the World. I do not agree with the fact that Marijuana should be legalised for recreational purposes in Canada because there are short term and long term effects which affect both the individual andRead Morelegalizing marijuana1044 Words   |  5 PagesLegalization of Marijuana Cannabis sativa or marijuana, is most known for its euphoric psychological effects when consumed. Many Canadians take part in the use of marijuana which has been illegal in Canada since the early 1900s. The topic of marijuana legalization in Canada has been a highly controversial topic over the last century. It has been discussed recently in the news due to Washington and Colorado both voting to legalize marijuana in November of 2012. The Liberal and Conservative partiesRead MoreWhy Hemp Should Be Legalized Throughout The U.s.1666 Words   |  7 Pages Industrial hemp should be legalized throughout the U.S. because it would greatly benefit everyone, it is not harmful in any way, it cannot get people high, and it is healthy for the environment. Although some people believe hemp is dangerous or the same thing as marijuana, it is actually a healthy thing, it can be used for many things, and it is nothing like marijuana (ethos). Some people believe hemp and marijuana are very much alike, however, they are far from a like. Yes, they are in the same

U.S Health Care Structure

Question: Discuss the public health power of the federal, state, and local governments. Explain the differences at each level and use this information to develop and justify your position regarding which level of government has the greatest power. Answer: Introduction The United States of America is a pristine nation that prioritizes the safety and health of its people above all the other welfare parameters. The U.S health care has three tiers/levels: local, state, and federal health care systems (Hyde Shortell, 2012). The local agencies are established in a city, neighborhood or county, the establishments depend upon the population of the locality and the state laws (McMillan v. Monroe County, 1997). Local health departments can be structured as a a health department administrated locally, a state health department branch, a district arising from a state, a multicounty area-administrated department (Natl Assn of County City Health Officials, 2005). The ultimate responsibility to protect the health of the nation lies in the hands of the U.S Department of Health and Human Services, which was initially established in the year 1980. The HHS being the main agency that overlooks the health care system of the nation, works closely with the local and state governments and monitors their performance so as to ensure the services are rendered rightly to the local population (Public Health Law Center, 2014). The U.S Public Health Service which was one of the oldest federal services that focused on public health is now a part of the HHS. The USPHS has about 6,000 health providers from varying sectors who work tirelessly to form a rigid health care system and also volunteer during the natural calamities. Most of the workers of USPHS are pharmacists while the rest are advisors and consultants. Constituents of HHS Some of the agencies that comprise HHS are Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The FDA mainly works with the manufacturers and is involved in the process of development of drugs. The Department is keen on ensuring the safety to consume or use products such as cosmetics, food and products that emit radiation. The CDC, on the other hand, works with researchers and practitioners to prevent the prevalent diseases from being transmitted. The CDC web site serves as the ultimate source for general practitioners and pharmacists to refer to symptoms and cures for various diseases. Pharmacists can use the site for obtaining information regarding the prevalent diseases and to advise patients about important vaccinations, symptoms for likely diseases, and treatment options for the appropriate diseases. Each of the tiers of the system of public health contributes significantly to public health care system of the nation. However, the state and local tiers form the backbone of the health care (Salinsky, 2010). The health system varies drastically in different localities, due to the extent of flexibility offered to the state governments in defining their public health role. Role of State Governments With the power to self-govern (Medtronic, Inc., 1996), state governments protect and promote health care by adopting the six prime responsibilities. The main duties are to develop policies, ensure compliance with the laws, assure the availability of resources, build a cohesive community by forming partnership through education and by collaborating with various stakeholders, continuously strive to improve the health status and policies, and to provide wholehearted support to the public health agencies seeking to improve. The state health department acts as the umbrella agency which comprises several other departments that performs a slew of other roles such as providing mental healthcare services, palliative care, and public assistance. More than half of the state public health departments are governed by the elected officials who act as the board members. The board advises other elected officials, forms health policies, and adopts health care legislative agendas. The members of the board are citizens, teachers, business men and women, educators, and health professionals. As most of the policies are formed by the elected officials and the legislature passes the public health laws, the state health agencies are strongly influenced by the boards decision. Local Health Care System The authority is delivered down to the localities by the state public health care system. The decisions undertaken by the local government, roles, responsibilities and the extent to which the local health care systems can exercise their policies depends largely on the laws adopted by the state health care system. The effectiveness of the functioning of the local health departments depends upon the how well the local and state health departments are associated (Assn of State and Territorial Health Officials, 2012). The most common relationships between the local and state health care departments are centralized, local, mixed, or hybrid systems. The functions performed by the local health care department vary according to size of populations served. Each state basically has counties and metropolitans; the size of each of these sectors forms the basis of the functioning of the local healthcare departments. Huge metropolitans require advanced and developed health care agencies while the smaller ones require health agencies that offer a minimal series of services in health. Discussion Both the local and state health departments play a vital role in caring for the health of the population. The state government manages more than 90% vaccine order management for both children and adult immunizations. The state government forms the policies and the health agencies usually possess more powers than the local health care systems. However in some cases, when the municipalities comprise of a large area, the local health care system is more advanced than the state level. The local health care department plays a bigger part in implementing the health care policies and coordinating jurisdiction of health care services. Most of their activities involve in ensuring that the community is provided effective and efficient health services. The local department works closely with the members of community to prevent diseases, develop public health policies, protect people from the potential health hazards, keep close tabs on the health status of the public, train the workforce appropriately and provide other such community health services. Generally the state governments have complete authority over the local governments. But as specified earlier, in some states the norms may vary and if the policies and laws of state governments are not established clearly, the Dillons Rule is followed by the local health care departments (Natl League of Cities, Local Government Authority, 2013). Under this rule, the local governments have a narrow authority and it is imperative for them to implement only those policies that are specified by the state government. Conclusion Reading about the powers and authority that is bestowed upon the three levels of system of health care of the USA, we realize that each tier has its own set of responsibilities and the contribution of each one is highly critical. It can be said that the three tiers co-exist and the nations overall health status cannot be maintained well without the significant contribution of any one of the departments. However, it seems that the most of the critical responsibilities are undertaken by the state healthcare systems. The state health care system acts as the connector between the national and local health care departments. Apart from being the connector, the state governments provide most of the health care services such as disease prevention, state laboratory services, environmental health, prevention of sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV/AIDS and offer mental health services such as counseling and partner notification. Moreover, the local governments are generally under the supervision of state health care systems. Although, the association between the local and state health care departments will vary from one state to the other, local governments are instructed by the state government by-the-rule. It can be inferred that the roles played in all the three levels are critical. To conclude, it is firmly believed that the state level of government has the highest power in forming policies, implementing them and supervising the local counties and municipalities. References Assn of State and Territorial Health Officials (2012), State Public Health Agency: Understanding the Relationship between State and Local Public Health, Retrieved from https://www.norc.org/PDFs/Projects/Classification%20of%20State%20Health%20Agencies/ASTHO%20 Hyde, J. K., Shortell, S. M. (2012), The structure and organization of local and state public health agencies in the U.S.: a systematic review, Am.J. Preventive Medicine, Retrieved from https://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/articles/journal_articles/2012/rwjf72639. McMillan v. Monroe County (1997), Ala., 520 U.S. 781, 780 Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/781/case.html. Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr (1996), 518 U.S. 470, 475 (1996) Natl Assn of County City Health Officials (2005), Operational Definition of a Functional Local Health Department 9, Retrieved from https://www.naccho.org/topics/infrastructure/accreditation/OpDef.cfm. Natl League of Cities (2013), Local Government Authority, Retrieved from https://www.nlc.org/buildskills-and-networks/resources/cities-101/city-powers/local-government-authority. Public Health Law Center (2014). State Local Public Health: An Overview of Regulatory Authority, William Mitchell College of Law, Retrieved from https://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/phlc-fs-state-local-reg-authority-publichealth-2015_0.pdf Salinsky, E., (2010), Governmental Public Health: An Overview of State and Local Public Health Agencies National Health Policy Forum Background Paper No. 77 8, Retrieved from https://www.nhpf.org/library/background-papers/BP77_GovPublicHealth_08-18-2010.pd

The Structure of Law Essays free essay sample

I can help you get first class marks. I can show you simple ways of becoming an amazing legal author. In this document I will provide you with some key tips on writing introductions. I will help you understand why those tips are important. And I will provide you with examples to help you use those tips. If you read this document and practise writing introductions – you will be a better writer and you will get better marks. See what I did there? See how I tried to capture your attention and get you to read on? See how you understand what to expect of this document? That’s the whole point of an introduction. Think of any great book that you have read or any great film that you have watched. The first few paragraphs or scenes are designed to grab you, to make you want more. There’s fundamentally nothing different with an introduction to a law essay (save that, if you write a bad introduction, your tutors have no choice over whether or not they carry on reading ) So, some top tips for writing introductions: 1. We will write a custom essay sample on The Structure of Law Essays or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Have an introduction. It is amazing the number of students who start writing the answer to the essay question without an introduction. Let me be clear. Not writing an introduction will mean you losing serious marks. The answer lies in good preparation. Think back to any exam in which you had to write an essay. Did you see anyone pick up the paper, read the question and immediately begin writing? These are the people you should be worried about. The best students read a question and take some time to think about and prepare their answers. They don’t start furiously scribbling. By taking some time out for prep, you will be able to really understand the question and what it is asking of you and, as a consequence, you will be able to demonstrate to the reader your mastery of the question in the introduction to the essay. Of course, this is much easier in non-exam based essays (where you can, and should, go back and edit your introduction after you have written the entire essay). 2. Think of context and opening lines. Essay questions in law tend to be on one big topic, from which you are asked to discuss/analyse/critically evaluate/review (etc) one small part. While your answer will have to focus on the sub-topic, you can grab the reader’s attention by giving context to the wider topic, by showing why what you are talking about is interesting/important/significant. Let me give you two examples: one from Company Law; and one from Environmental Law. Example 1 Company Law Question: The derivative claim in s260ff of the Companies Act 2006 is ineffective and in need of reform. Discuss. Opening Line: â€Å"Remedies granted to shareholders to challenge corporate decision making are a means of calling company directors to account, particularly in situations where ownership and control of large corporations are disparate. The derivative claim, in s260ff of the Companies Act 2006 † [Here, the question asks you about derivative claims, but if you study company law, you will know that these are but one of three main mechanisms by which shareholders can challenge decisions made by company directors. This opening line shows that (a) you know where the question fits in to the topics you have studied and (b) you are aware of context (that is, what the topic is ‘about’)] Example 2 – Environmental Law Question: â€Å"Critically evaluate the ‘information as regulation’ aspects of Opening line: â€Å"Chemicals regulation in the EU attempts to reconcile promotion of innovation in a fundamentally key industry sector with the protection of human health and the environment. the EU’s primary vehicle for chemicals regulation, contains † [As with the Company Law example, here you are showing that you understand the wider context and that you understand why the question, and the larger topic, are so challenging. ] 3. Have a clear line of argument. The reader needs to know, in broad terms, what you are going to say to know whether it is worth reading on. Telling them what you will be arguing also helps them understand whether you are saying something persuasive and, at a more basic level, helps them understand what it is you are trying to say. As Jo Hunt says, writing a law essay is not like writing a detective novel. No one wants to wait until the last line for the big reveal, to find out â€Å"whodunit†. Instead, you need to be telling your reader, in your introduction, exactly what your conclusion is going to be. As Richard Moorhead comments, â€Å"Outside of fiction, and interestingly judicial judgments, writing should generally not be a magical mystery tour. The best writing generally tells the reader what they will learn from reading the full text and it does so very early on (in the introduction). So if the question is, Do you think capital punishment is right or wrong, you would say from the outset of the essay what your line is. Say, â€Å"I will argue that capital punishment is wrong. † Or, â€Å"I will argue that capital punishment is right for certain types of offence. †Ã¢â‚¬  4. Keep it short and keep it snappy. The introduction introduces. It doesn’t give everything in full detail. That’s what the body of your essay is for. So, in exam conditions where you have 45 minutes – 1 hour for an answer, you’re probably looking at no more than a couple of paragraphs. In summative work (or work in non-exam conditions), try and keep your introduction to no more than 10% of the total word count. This figure, 10%, is not a magic number. It’s just a rough guide. Be sensible. Remember that the Introduction is not the be-all and end-all; it’s simply the start of your essay (which then has to deliver on what you promised in the introduction). . Show you understand what the question asks of you. Show that you have a clear grasp of the question and its various limbs. This goes back to the need for preparation. Take time to really interrogate the question and to work out the various elements you will need to discuss/review/present (etc) to give a full and in depth answer to the question set. Also remember to actually answer the question that’s been set. So many students simply give a stock answer to a question they have on Topic X in their head, without fully paying attention to what the question is asking of them. 6. Say what you’re saying. Give the reader an idea of how your answer will be structured. This will let them know (a) whether they want to read on and (b) what sort of grasp you have of the question. A good structure is a sign of the author’s command of the material: they show they are on top of the subject and will be taking the reader through the material in a logical order. It also makes the essay easier to understand. The reader knows what to expect when. If you go and look at articles printed in leading journals, you will see different approaches to structure in introductions. Some people are mechanical. They say, â€Å"First, I will look at Then I will look at Then I will go on to discuss †. This is fine is you are pressed for time, but you might try and be a little more creative. Say, in Tort, you have been given the following question: â€Å"â€Å"It is all too easy to criticise the tort system. In practice, it works well. † Discuss† – here, you could say â€Å"First, I will look at the criticisms of the Tort system. Then I will look at arguments in favour of the current system. † While this gives the reader an idea of how your answer will be structured, it is not very sophisticated. Instead, how about, The first part of this paper will review and evaluate the theoretical and practical critiques of the current Tort system. The second looks at reforms to Tort introduced to date that have sought to improve on existing deficiencies. Thirdly, I will consider alternative compensation mechanisms to Tort, both in the UK and elsewhere. This paper concludes by arguing that † Sometimes a really excellent introduction breaks their argument into subsections and uses that breaking up of the argument as a structure. This has the benefit of structuring the essay and providing the reader with a really good route-map for the essay’s argument. So, to develop the previous example: Tort is the critical means by which individuals can right the wrongs inflicted on them by others. I will argue that a pragmatic defence of the tort system, which suggests it is working reasonably well, is not supported by close analysis of any aspect of the tot system. Firstly, I will show how the theoretical underpinning of the tort system is incoherent. Secondly, I will demonstrate how the practical underpinnings of the system fail to meet basic expectations of any system of redress. Thirdly, I will show how domestic reform of tort systems have failed to grapple with these theoretical and practical problems. I will conclude by outlining genuine alternatives to the current systems which will better meet the expectations of a system of redress. This kind of approach provides a clear structure and actually begins to develop the line of argument which the introduction has set out. The reader can then begin to judge for themselves whether this essay is going to say anything which interests them or from which they might learn. The idea is that the introduction should navigate the reader around the main body of the essay. 7. Don’t rewrite the question in your own words. The examiner will have written the question. They know what it says. They don’t need you to tell them what it says. So, if the question, in Land, says, â€Å"Squatting can never be justified morally or legally†, don’t regurgitate the question and put in your introduction, â€Å"This question requires a discussion of whether squatting can ever be justified morally or legally†. 8. Engage with the question. I realise that most of the time, most of you will not care about various questions in law. You will not have sleepless nights thinking about the scope and nature of legitimate expectations or the teleological approach of the ECJ. But when it comes to writing an essay question, you have to pretend to care a little bit. You have to put aside your boredom of Criminal Law/Trusts/Land Law/[insert name here of module you do not like] and show the examiner that you are engaged with the issue. One of the ways you can do is that by having an opinion/argument. So, if the question says to you, â€Å"Recklessness in Criminal Law should always be judged by an objective standard†, have an opinion (one way or the other) on that standard. It doesn’t matter if you don’t 110% passionately and whole heartedly feel/care about that opinion, just have one. Essays are arguments, not descriptions. So, the thing to take away from this tip is: have a point and get it across in the introduction. 9. Remember: this is law, not theatre studies. Your introduction needs to be clear, concise, well structured and to have a point/an opinion. It shouldn’t be overly flamboyant or written like the start of an opinion piece in a tabloid newspaper. So, in response to the question, â€Å"The Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 has had a limited effect on the doctrine of privity of contract†, don’t write â€Å"The 1999 Act is a travesty and a disgrace and should be abolished forthwith†. You have to strike a balance between grabbing the attention of the reader, while still writing ‘like a lawyer’. 10. And, finally, remember that the introduction is the first thing the reader sees. And it’s the first thing the examiner who comes to mark your essay knows of you and your abilities. Make it count and keep the reader/examiner happy. Structuring Your Introduction With the above in mind, here is one way you could structure your introductions. There is no magical rule here and the following is but one way of structuring: †¢Give context/the framework in which the topic operates. This will require some thought (and hopefully will be something you have thought about before the exam/before you come to write your essay). What you are looking for here is a general statement on the topic, what is the topic ‘about’. †¢Start to narrow down from the large topic/framework to the specific question set (i. e. o from the general to particular) †¢ Give a map of how your essay will look †¢Give the statement of your thesis (that is, show your engagement/give your opinion or view) To help you with introductions, I have pulled together, in the following pages, some examples from a number of subjects. In each example, there is a ‘good’ and a ‘bad’ introduction. You should look at these examples and work out why the ‘good’ introductions are ‘good’ and why the ‘bad’ introductions are ‘bad’.

Authoritarian Approach to Management Essays

Authoritarian Approach to Management Essays Authoritarian Approach to Management Paper Authoritarian Approach to Management Paper CASE STUDY ANALYSIS AN AUTHORITARIAN APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT This essay makes available an analysis of a case study pertaining to tribulations in human resources management and management technique at the Polk County Social Welfare Department. Patton, the new Director, manifest an exceedingly authoritarian management style. The analysis includes problem diagnosis, analysis and evaluation of alternative solutions, and recommendations for actions. Like Patton, administrators who adopt an authoritarian approach lay down clear rules for subordinates and expect them to obey not only the rules but the also the administrator with authority. An authoritarian style of leading uses outside incentives such as: rewards for obeying the rules and consequences for breaking them. An administrator who adopts this approach tends to lack affection and openness and values their own opinions over those of their lessors. The foremost objective of an authoritarian administrator is to increase overall conformity and they seek to accomplish this end through the use of outside enticements which often suggest obedience out of apprehension. Patton adapted to this way of managing because he was raised to respect and value work ethic. His parents were industrious and committed who believed in corporal reprimand. It was not difficult to understand why Patton adapted to the authoritarian approach to management. Authoritarian style is implemented when the person in charge tells his/her employees what is expected and how it should be done, without getting the advice of cohorts. A quantity of the suitable conditions to employ it is when you have all the information to get to the bottom of the dilemma, you are limited on time, and your workforce is well motivated. A number of people have a propensity to consider this style as a medium for screaming, using undignified words, and leading by intimidation and misusing their authority. The authoritarian style should more often than not be used on extraordinary circumstances. In an effort to achieve more commitment and motivation from your employees, Patton might try using the participative style. This style of authoritarian principal can lead to bitterness and contribute to the encouragement of insecurities. After all, rejecting suggestions of workers may be perceived as an aggressive or bossy approach. Participative style would allow Patton to include one or more employees in on the decision making process (determining what to do and how to do it). On the other hand, Patton would maintain the final decision making authority. Using this style is not an indication of weakness; rather it is an indication of strength that your employees will respect and admire. In this case Motivation Theory might help resolve some of Patton’s problems within his department. In Theory X and Theory Y, McGregor identifies two sets of assumptions about the nature of people: Theory X is a set of essentially negative assumptions about the nature of people and Theory Y is a set of positive assumptions about the nature of people. McGregor’s XY Theory is a valuable and undemanding reminder of the natural rules for managing people, which under the heaviness of everyday business are all too without difficulty elapsed. In lieu of the information presented in this analysis, conceivably the most evident characteristics of McGregors XY Theory and the easiest to exemplify are found in the behaviors of autocratic managers and organizations which use autocratic management styles such as Patton did in his role as a manager. It is part of the manager’s job to exercise authority, and there are cases in which this is the only method of achieving the desired results because subordinates do not agree that the ends are desirable. In reality, some theories are unrealizable in practice, but if managers put into action that employee will contribute to the organizational goals if they are treated as responsible and valued employees. Qualitative and Quantitative analysis can both be used in this situation; however, there are pros and cons associated with each taking into consideration the two types of data analysis form dissimilar, not compulsory, irreconcilable perspectives on quantity statistics. Nonetheless, I think that qualitative analysis is an absolute detailed description which allows for superior distinctions to be drawn. Likewise, a lack of understanding of practice organization and function has limited the effectiveness of attempts to change practice behaviors. Therefore, a qualitative analysis might be used with a cross-sectional study or multimethod approach that included direct observation of managers within the public welfare agency, questionnaires of employes, and semistructured participant observation of the organization. The goals of the qualitative component of the study might be to recognize and demonstrate the barriers to nd the opportunities for successful and well-organized management approaches. Finally, the extent to which leaders are able to manage change, develop consensus, and maintain loyalty will establish the success/failure of any organizational management idea or reorganization endeavor. One of the most noteworthy factors that impede success in organizations is lack of leadership. Continuous, attentiveness, self-evident leadership is very important for flourishing achievement o f organizational change.

Post-reading and study activities Research Paper

Post-reading and study activities - Research Paper Example This is an unfortunate situation, but it does happen. â€Å"Kids who struggle with reading dont need a dramatically or categorically different approach (Feldman)† what they need are dedicated teachers who are willing to spend more time with them and make reading interesting. Gone are the days when teachers stand before a class and read; while the students sit and look as if they are listening to boring sermon. Teachers need teaching aid and the ability to make reading fun. Reading is no longer an activity of turning the pages, and testing students in order to see if they know the words in the lesson. More time should be given to students who are â€Å"delinquent.† Of course, they will not appreciate the extra attention. However when they are grouped, and given an aid like the graphic organizer, they will begin to have fun. In this first activity, the Graphic Organizer will be used. Teacher will give students this work sheet after they have read and discussed the reading, explain to them what is meant by cause and effect (of course most of them have already used this), assume no one knows. Teacher may ask some cause and effect question by way of explanation. Students will work in groups of four or three. They will be given the work sheet and whether they want to use the book or memory, they should fill in the effect map as best they can. The objective of this activity is to help students to think logically. In this activity, students will answer question about the passage. The objective of this activity is to help students develop their comprehension skills, to use inference, and to express themselves in writing. Everywhere you hear it. On the streets, in churches in the media, sometimes even from teachers. People using â€Å"you know what I am saying?† It is even worse when their only adjective is a curse word. Students are no different, their vocabulary is limited and it is obvious

Are states the driving force behind globalisation, or its victims Essay

Are states the driving force behind globalisation, or its victims - Essay Example It is for this reason that arguments and counterarguments have been advanced, concerning states as the driving forces in international relations, or victims of the same. A clear analysis of international relations and politics reveals that states are the main actors or the driving force in international relations, as shall be seen in the discussion that ensues forthwith. That states are the main actors behind globalisation, is a matter that is well underscored by the events that surrounded and succeeded Cold War. Although globalisation can be said to have started towards the end of the 16th century AD as feudalism was being replaced by capitalism in Western Europe, yet states played a pivotal role in triggering the advent of globalisation. The role of the state in globalisation is underscored by the fact that the pace in which globalisation takes place has mainly been commensurate with interests and input of the major powers in international relations. This is in complete consistence with all the theoretical frameworks that make attempt at explaining international relations. This is to say that if states have the might to hinder globalisation, then they also have the wherewithal to catalyse globalisation (Peet, 2009, 105). Scholte (2005, 125) is poignant that the role that states play in international relations is even more pronounced when international relations is viewed through the prism of realism. Realism has it that the world of politics is driven by self-interests which are highly competitive in nature. Realism continues that the very international system wherein states compete is anarchic. By this, it is not meant that international system is inherently chaotic, but that there is no higher power that can hinder aggression or make arbitrations on disputes. Because of this, this anarchical system forces states to arm themselves in